There’s a poll on espn.com right now asking “Who has the toughest job to save his or her sport?” After about 4,000 votes the results are:
44% – Candace Parker
32% – Sidney Crosby
13% – Big Brown
10% – Danica Patrick
I’d say these results are mostly fair, although I don’t really understand the wording “save” the sport. In Candace’s case, yes, she will have a large part in “saving” the WNBA which has been viewed as a joke to most people and struggles to keep its head above water. However, the league is still expanding and I wouldn’t save its in any imminent danger – maybe it should be worded as “generating legitimate interest” in the sport. Sidney Crosby is a solid #2 because it will be difficult to raise the NHL to a sense of relevancy for the common sports fan, but does the NHL need saving? In a recent Harris Poll asking “If you could pick one sport as your favorite”, Hockey ranked higher than Pro Basketball, and the NBA is in fine shape. I believe it ranks higher because Hockey is more of a niche sport – I would guess that most NBA fans are also NFL fans or college ball fans,
so because the poll only include your favorite, it ends up with a lower tally. This is not a bad thing for hockey because it means more hardcore fans – with a hardcore fan base, hockey doesn’t need “saving”. Likewise Big Brown isn’t going to “save” Horse Racing – It has its followers as it has seemingly forever and gets its share of coverage around Triple Crown time (although PETA might have other plans). Also, Danica Patrick goes under the “generating interest” column because unlike the other three on this poll, she isn’t at the top of her sport – and a sport that would be “saved” by open-wheel unification, not by one driver.
The real issue in my mind is that ESPN does not have enough respect/coverage of other sports beyond it’s “Big 3″ – football, baseball, basketball. Just because these sports aren’t given equal coverage time by ESPN, doesn’t mean they don’t have large, dedicated followings. What about the MLB? It’s embroiled in a scandal which taints the results of its games for over a decade, and by that Harris Poll has lost 8 percentage points in the last 20 years. Does it need “saving”? Probably not, because it still has a large following, but I could make a better argument for the MLB than for the NHL. Even the NBA has gone through a major “Post-Jordan depression” and has dropped from 13% to 4% in the last decade. Same argument applies.
The bottom line? As much as I love SportsCenter, its time for ESPN to stop snubbing other sports and earn the self-proclaimed title “Worldwide Leader in Sports”. Maybe better wording of polls such as these would be an easy way to get started.
Posted by capitalsports 
